complements of http://atlantisite.com and Dean Clarke at email@example.com
Glozel Tablets possible origins........................
[Explanation is below this picture] origin - map laid out by Dean Clarke 03/16/03
There actually numerous sites that have examples of the Glozel Tablet unbaked clay examples but few have if ever noted nor connected the examples to what I am now proposing. The sites include-
Ain Ghazal-in Jordan-Syria regional culture 7,500 BC unbaked statues
Cucuteni- in Bulgaria Region close to Black Sea 7,500 BC unbaked statues
Cuina Turculie- Yugoslavia-Romanian Border 7,500-18,000 BC unbaked statues
Glozel of Vichey- France 10,000-7,000 BC ? unbaked statues
As you can see the unbaked clay anthropomorphic objects of usually a bovine or a bear appear in these areas which are carry over from a Paleolithic religious magic type worship. At first geometric script was rare on top of these objects and the earliest marks were related to intended stab marks (sympathetic magic or animal magic kill control device or practice act). Then in Ain Ghazal we see circles and cones hieroglyphically or geometrically symbolized appear on the unbaked clay anthropomorphic objects which represent salt cones made from salt pots of clay cone shaped kind of like the Egyptian cakes later. Then in Cucuteni (not to mention Catal Huyuk as well) the unbaked clay and salt cones appear and are represented in the script on anthropomorphic tablets or its related industry similar to Ain Ghazal. In this region of Cucuteni the name Zargos appears a reverse of Ghazal (Zal-Zar+Ghaz-Goz)? On these at Cucuteni the script does appear on the objects but on a limited degree and stab marks are on them as well the difference is that other symbols begin to appear varied from the Ain Ghazal ones. Yet both are geometric like in nature. At Cuina Turculie there are close relative unbaked objects and script found in both older bone object of a horse phalanx and some of the chevron geometric scripts appear on later unbaked anthropomorphic objects of Yugoslavia and Romania. Then in Glozel around Vichey France the tablet has chevron, almost cone, circles, and 's' or zigzags of 'n' shape found in turkey and those above mentioned regions combined. The problem is that the Glozel is a pure prototype unknown in those countries so far found, and only parts of images are found on the others not in the whole sense like Glozel. We can conclude only two things.
One is that the Glozel is a whole trade complex in progression of writing and made after the others appeared to the east which is very plausible.
But the second is more provocative, the Glozel is a purest form which moved eastward and eroded in expression and bi-furcated in meaning and intension into other local industries or interests. That being the case it would seem to parallel the Berber ancient migrations which came a little after the Azillian expansions and progressed the art of anthropomorphic objects with script on them.
This second suggestion would mean that the Glozel tablet appeared just before the complete great Caucasian invasions and would have more the Libyan-Iberian and local French influences. This being the case the Pig and Bear or the seven stars for seeking iron, hematite, green schist, salt, and geometric writing in the early Mesolithic period was major movement paralleling agriculture if not a little earlier.
This is why I call this "Post Azillian-Chacolithic" Goszar Race which reflects the
Libya-Iber Caucasian trade combined experience.
I must put forward the Glozel tablet is real not a forgery in light of these points which is namely this:
Ain Ghazal-1968 found
the other sites not discovered before mostly 1940
Glozel was 1921 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There is no way a psychic forgery could occur, you see !!!!!!!!!
It maybe mentioned the story of the Libyans entering Egypt with a higher culture can now be explained as the Gerza dynamic.....................yet it was also an extension of a earlier late Paleolithic experiences that became progressed and geometric-ized.
Also there was a circular occurrence of trade that involved a late Azillian Berber push above Sicily, and the consequence of the Caucasian trade journey south into Jordan to Egypt to Libya itself ending in Spain. The Glozel tablet occurred therefore before the Caucasian migration reached beyond Egypt to Libya?
This means Sicily (being center of sphere of influence between Caucasian invasion and Azillian Berber final expansion) holds the key to the chronological re-looking at the establishment of the true Mesolithic age beginnings at about 7,300 BC?
We could also establish the cockle shell, geometric writing, unbaked objects of animals, green schist, and salt trade as the final stage or end of the Epi-paleolithic stage.
Lastly, I have deciphered the Glozel Tablet, have ebook and other modes to explain these points..........contact at firstname.lastname@example.org
By D. Clarke holds rights to this information in this form of discovery March 16th 2003 or email@example.com
Cucuteni sculptures http://www.culture.fr/culture/arcnat/harsova/en/balk4.htm
Danube-Don River romboid symbol horse phalanx http://www.hominids.com/donsmaps/cuina.html
Ain Ghazal animal objects clay http://link.lanic.utexas.edu/menic/ghazal/ChapII/chapter2.html
Glozel Tablet http://www.atlantisquest.com/glozel.html